If you’re buying the 16-inch MacBook Pro, then both chips have the same 12-core CPU, so you don’t get any direct benefit from the M2 Max for processor-intensive tasks. But if you keep a MacBook for quite a few years, it might be worth thinking about how the difference may play out as battery performance degrades. In practice, this means I can use it on battery for two to three days at a time, plugging it in like every so often.įor me personally, once you hit true all-day life, then this kind of difference is pretty academic: There’s never going to be a time when I’m not charging overnight, even in the most mobile-centric use. I averaged closer to 17 nonstop hours on the M2 Pro model. I averaged close to 14 hours of nonstop use on the M2 Max model with my workload largely involves Chrome tabs, Google docs, and some streaming The first thing that jumped out at me in Monica Chin’s piece for The Verge is that the more powerful chip means taking a reasonably big hit to battery life. It’s not exactly a detailed comparison, but it does provide a pointer to the three usage cases likely to justify the M2 Max … M2 Pro vs.

We’ve seen what Apple has to say about the differences, and how they stack up in benchmark rankings.Ī new piece today looks beyond the benchmarks to how the two chips compare when used for real-life video work in the 16-inch MacBook Pro. One of the decisions you need to make when buying a MacBook Pro or new Mac mini is the chip: M2 Pro vs.

Macbook pro battery x mark